Sample by My Essay Writer
In the family setting, the functionality of genograms towards pastoral care assists and facilitates the process of interaction between the pastor and family members at different levels. Assessing and understanding of genograms may thus assist the pastor to position himself in relation to the characteristics and relations expressed by members of a family. In this way, the level of meaning of each connection and relation within families allow the pastor to take advantage of the orientation of relations to instill qualities, assistance and even better these relations depending on the level of social work intended.
A family’s illustrative setting not only provides one with an understanding of how the family members relates to each other, but it also gives information on specific situations that necessitate the intervention of pastoral care (Guerin & Pendagast, 1976). As a function of social work, it is important that this process of establishment, drafting and usage of genograms incorporate itself into the pastoral care. In the environment of my work, the best practice methods to using genograms in provision of care include the gathering of data on family dynamics, appreciation of relationships and behavioral alignment of each member. The usage of the genogram as a tool must involve the social constructs of gaining insight into social and cultural practices within the family setting (Guerin & Pendagast, 1976). In addition, it is necessary to align the identities of family members with the help intended from the pastoral care process.
In similar capacity, these illustrations facilitate the reframing and standardizing of perceptions from each individual in this environment. The usage of patterns established by the family members themselves is useful in creating solutions to social problems on an applicable level (Guerin & Pendagast, 1976). In conclusion, these capacities self-activate from interactive usage of genograms as assistive tools for the delivery of pastoral care. [Need an essay writing service? Find help here.]
Responses to Peers
Skowron and Farrar (2015) use the genogram as a tool to explain the necessity of interactions between an external people interacting with family members. In this capacity, the discussion varies from the usage of interactive tools, such as supreme integrative tools that capture the relationship dynamic of each member and create a real process for the reading and appreciation of individualized information. The analytical point taken by Skowron and Farrar (2015) not only captures the interests of a pastoral caregiver, but it also enhances the process within which social work can engage the genogram as a representation of relationships- within which a pastor can intervene. In addition, it is possible to establish cultural aspects from a genogram- especially those with influence on relationships and pastoral work. Such positions are oriented in similar manner as the ideology of pastoral care needing to appeal to interpersonal relationships and connections as indicated by a family genogram. [“Write my essay for me?” Get help here.]
In comparison, Guerin and Pendagast (1976) assume the social standpoint from which special dynamics limit the interactions achievable between external parties and private lives of family members. The genogram is a representation of the cultural and social interactions between persons in a family, and this aspect is significant towards pastoral caregiving. As a social function, culturally inclined relations between these persons are a function of the relationships observable from the family situation. Therefore, for an externally positioned social worker to penetrate these relationships and command affiliation from family members, it is essential to understand family dynamics from multiple standpoints (social, cultural, spiritual and personal) (Guerin & Pendagast, 1976). The explanations on the significance of the genogram in this ideology appeals to the discussed position a pastoral caregiver has to adopt towards a more effective social process.
References
Guerin, P. I., & Pendagast, E. C. (1976). Evaluation of family system and genogram. In P. Guerin (Ed.), Family therapy: Theory and practice (pp. 450-464). New York, NY: Gardner Press.
Skowron, E., & Farrar, J. (2015). Multigenerational family systems. In T. Sexton & J. Lebow (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy (pp. 159-181). New York, NY: Routledge.
