Sample by My Essay Writer

Between 1.5 and 3.5 million elementary and high school students throughout the United States suffer from attention deficit/hyperactive disorder (ADHD), researchers from the University of Washington say (ADHD, 2005). That represents approximately 5 per cent of boys and 2 per cent of girls. The National Institutes of health stated that over one million children in the U.S. are medicated to control their hyperactive behavior. While it is unknown why ADHD appears to affect boys more than girls, it is clear that up to 60 per cent of children who suffer from the disorder will continue to struggle in adulthood. In this essay, I will discuss whether ADHD is over or under diagnosed, by investigating the opinions from around the world, and by analysing studies on the subject matter. It is important to establish whether ADHD is as prevalent as many doctors and parents say it is. Because while many children show a complete lack of ability to concentrate in class, the children’s behavior is a natural part of their development.

Before investigating the various studies related to ADHD, it is important to clearly define the disorder. The basic feature of ADHD is a consistent pattern of hyperactivity and/or inattention. This is impulsive and while many people display a degree of these traits, those with ADHD are believed to have a harder time concentrating and controlling themselves. Many of the ADHD symptoms are evident in people prior to age 7. People who have ADHD have some impairment of the symptoms in more than one setting. These could include at school and at home. Also, people with the disorder have interference with their developmentally appropriate social, occupational or academic functioning. “The disturbance does not occur exclusively during the course of a Pervasive Developmental Disorder, Schizophrenia, or other Psychotic Disorders and is not better accounted for by another mental disorder,” (Definition, n.d.). ADHD also consists of three subtypes.


Sample by My Essay Writer

Question 1
Is geometry created or discovered?

Geometry is discovered. This is made obvious because spheres such as planets, stars, suns and grains of sand have existed before people existed, no matter what a person’s spiritual beliefs are. From the appearance of things, and from scientific proof, the universe is older than human existence. The Greek geometry figures are among the oldest recorded evidence of humans using geometry.

Questions 2A.
Based on the introduction of Sacred Geometry Philosophy & Practice, how do geometry and science interact?

Geometry is linked to arithmetic, music and astrology/astronomy. Geometry actually links all of these areas of study. Sacred geometry is the study of each of the forms and shapes of these topics that are pervaded by the unseen and seen universe. Geometry gives it structure and purpose in an infinite number of expressions. Essentially, geometry is the presentation of numbers for the eye to see, and it is done in a measured and ordered space. It does so in an organized, conscious, logical and organic way.

Questions 2B.
Do you agree with Lawlor’s evaluation of our sensory organs? If so, why do you agree? If not, explain your argument.

I tend to believe that geometry can be understood by study, rather than by having to tune into the universe, as he suggested when citing Plato and Pythagoras. Lawlor also states that there could be an “abstraction” of thought that is needed to see geometry as form and structure, as well as the study of ratios. However, I think it can be shown clearly to people who understand how to interpret the numbers. I do agree with his point that our sensory organs need to relate geometry to harmonies and relationships, such as a sensory manifestation like colour or music.


Sample by My Essay Writer

Daniel Akst and Naomi Klein provide an interesting take on the conditions that lead to materialism. Their texts provide insights and opinions into various aspects on materialism and its effects on the human race. Akst’s discussion is focused on the religious aspect of materialism and what people are doing with their identities when they decide to dress their lives up with possessions, and thus wear a mask. Klein’s piece, however, focuses more on the marketing aspect of materialism. By reading each of these texts, one will have learned two viewpoints on different ends of materialism: the seller and the buyer. The mentality of the buyer, as Akst points out, is for people to bury themselves in a mask. Klein, on the other hand, takes a look at the seller’s ideas about how to develop and market a cool product that people will want to buy. Ultimately, these two authors have laid the foundation for the reasons why society finds materialism so irresistible. People don’t have much of a choice, these authors would suggest, but to follow in line with what is deemed appropriate by society for a person to attempt to become their idea of perfection in a mask.

In Akst’s piece, it is interesting to note his attitude towards materialism. He clearly has the view that material wealth does not lead to happiness, but instead to misery. He opens his text by saying that the two things Americans are good at are closely related to materialism: “One is generating almost unimaginable material wealth, and the other is feeling bad about it,” (Akst, par. 1). Being materialist is tempting, he argues, and the vast majority of Americans are unable to resist the temptation. When they can’t resist buying things, they feel guilty about making the purchase, and this is a cycle that they find hard to refuse. He is investigating in his texts the idea that people are making these pointless purchases so that they can attempt to become someone else, someone different than who they are.

Akst says that people feel bad about making their purchase because they wonder about what God would have to say about what they are doing. The Bible teaches that the love of money is the root of all evil and that is something that many of these people could be worried about. God might be able to see behind the masks that the products that they are purchasing are hiding them behind. Akst suggests that God could even be of two minds about the merits of materialism. Some have the idea, as Akst points out, that God wants people to live in their “station.” This is what he refers to as a form of insubordination against the “concepts of copia.” But in America today, the vast majority is living in a condition that is the opposite of the type of world that God wanted people to live in. “Over the centuries the holiest among us, at least putatively, have been those who shunned the material possessions and kept their eyes on some higher prize,” (Akst, par. 7). In this passage Akst is saying that it is more in accordance with what God wants if people stopped being so materialistic.

This materialism that Akst speaks of flies somewhat in the face of religion because it gives off the impression that there is something more grand that God, and these material things also distract from God. Those who are the holiest, he argues, are the ones who have turned their backs on material possessions and have instead focused on serving God. After all, what point is there in collecting material possessions if you can’t take them with you in the afterlife, unless you’re a pharaoh? Those who do accumulate money during their time on Earth, should give it to the community, a Puritan would suggest. Money doesn’t belong to the people; it belongs to God, Akst writes.

Akst’s piece describes a scenario where many people are cloaked in materialism. In all of our jobs, we are wearing masks. People dress and accumulate possessions in such a way that they are falling into a pattern that they believe they have to fall into. These same people also feel like they need to act a certain way in order to be accepted by their peers. This culture of wearing masks starts from an early age, even when a child is given a blue toy if he is a boy and a pink toy if she is a girl. This begins the cycle of conditioning. As the child gets older, he or she starts to become influenced by the media they are exposed to. They begin emulating the type of person they want to be and, in doing so, often need to make purchases to look like the model that is wearing a specific brand of shirt, for example. They also purchase possessions that their peers have, in order to fit in with the crowd. The advertisements target specific demographics and convince many people that they need to have the product that is being marketed. Even if the person can’t afford the product that they feel they need, they can make a purchase on a Credit Card.

The limit is out there. Or isn’t it? Akst suggests that the mask that people put on is linked to human vanity. As long as we desire to keep up with our neighbors when it comes to possessions, we won’t stop at much. And it’s becoming more expensive to “Keep up with the Jones’,” as the cliché goes. It’s now about keeping up with the Johnson’s, a much richer party. As Naomi Klein points out in “Alt.Everything: The Youth Market and the Marketing of Cool,” the companies have specifically targeted people and advertised in a way that would appeal to them most, making the advertisements difficult to deny.

When it comes to youths, that means becoming less of a company that would be approved of on Wall Street, and more of a company that is underground. The companies are essentially adjusting themselves so that the teenage public will think that they are cool. This makes it very difficult for people to deny the fact that they want the product. And this desire leads them to make purchases that they might not be able to afford, or spend money that they could otherwise save. Teenagers are perhaps the most easily influenced demographic, so training them to desire items makes it hard for them to stop as they become adults. And it’s hard for these teenagers to shake the inevitable materialist mentality that they will develop. Because if they don’t develop this mentality and make purchases that will make their peers think they are cool, then they will be outcasts, and nobody wants that. Everyone wants to be accepted, so these companies follow the teenagers and use them as lab rats, as Klein points out. In fact, some companies have the specific goal of studying developments in culture and making them into a product. These businesses pitch the lifestyle to companies in order to encourage them to create products that they think would appeal to these demographics and which other people would want to adopt as well. “Of course all this has to be taken with a grain of salt. Cool hunters and their corporate clients are locked in a slightly S/M, symbiotic dance: the clients are desperate to believe in a just-beyond-their-reach well of untapped cool, and the hunters, in order to make their advice more valuable, exaggerate the crisis of credibility the brands face,” (Klein, p. 36).

In a person’s life, they are presented with an array of choices about how to act and look. Because people are so influenced by those around them, it becomes very difficult to ignore the seduction of companies that make promises of being cool. Products are gift wrapped and designed for specific demographics and it becomes difficult for people to refuse the link between the product and people’s emotions, a link that is subconscious to the majority. It isn’t products that people want to buy, it is the way that those products make people feel that has led to a society set on making endless, needless purchases.

Works Cited
Akst, Daniel. “Buyer’s Remorse”. The Wilson Quarterly. (2004): n. pag. Web. 23 Nov. 2012.

Klein, Naomi. “Alt.Everything: The Youth Market and the Marketing of Cool.” Fads, Fetishes, 
and FunAndrew Jones. San Diego. University Readers, Inc., 2010. 29-47. Print.


Sample by My Essay Writer

The National Assessment Collaboration (NAC) is meant to assess students to see if they are ready to become accredited as an international medical graduate (IMG). This would approve them for entrance into a Canadian residency program.

The examination is a national standardized test that evaluates students’ knowledge, attitudes and skills that are necessary to be approved for job training in Canada. The test could include problems associated with pediatrics, medicine, psychiatry, surgery, community health and preventative medicine, and gynecology and obstetrics. Language use and proficiency are important, as is a general knowledge of the therapeutic management associated with common complaints.

The test is scored as a standalone test to any other examinations by the Medical Council of Canada. The presentation and scoring of the material is completed and presented according to a standard that is consistent with what is expected of a graduating medical student who is attending a Canadian medical school. Included is a high standard of ethics and professionalism that is appropriate for physicians who are entering the postgraduate training.

NAC consists of a written therapeutic component and a series of clinical stations, making it as much about studying the material as it is about applying what students learn. The program prepares students for the real-world by simulating the typical scenarios that students will experience in the clinics.
The examination results will be used to rank students to see how they compare to other IMGs. Passing the test doesn’t guarantee the student a training position, but it does let the program directors know about the strongest candidates.

Any student who is NAC test-eligible needs to have passed the Medical Council of Canada Evaluating Examination. Some regions may demand additional criteria prior to taking the exam.
Objective Structured Clinical Examinations

The Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCE) are designed to assess students’ clinical skills. Students should attempt to gain an understanding of what is expected from the station and identify the level of understanding that is needed in order to complete the test successfully. In each station that students complete the test, they will only be evaluated for the components that are relevant at each one of the stations. This means that if there is a component the student doesn’t do correctly, but it isn’t a part of that particular station’s test, then the student won’t be penalized for the error.

Each of the OSCE station tests will take between 5 and 20 minutes. In these stations, students will be asked to undergo a medical encounter with a patient. This is meant to simulate an actual encounter in a clinic. During some of the OSCE exams, you will be joined by a physician, who will be examining students’ skills. They will be watching for students’ communication skills and clinical skills based on a checklist. Some of the exams are also videotaped so that they can be assessed later.
Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examination Part II

The Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examination Part II (MCCQE2) is a five-day condensed course that is taken by physicians and residents. This course is a chance to review material pertinent to the MCCQE2 exam. The course is only offered twice each year, and the MCCQE2 is generally offered not long before the exams in May and October.

The topics in the exam can vary, but are generally based on counselling, management, history and examination. The review course is a helpful tool that can prepare students for the challenging test. The small class size allows students to gain special attention from teachers, so that they can address the topics that they find challenging.


Sample by My Essay Writer

1. Through comparing the features, characters, and themes in the play “Hamlet” and the novel “Frankenstein,” there appears to be an attitude towards life, where life is a mirror that can reflect people’s hearts. This is a theme inherent in both novels. People are born with goodness; however, living changes people’s characters. Human behavior can reflect the process of the change that occurs. The main characters in both William Shakespeare’s “Hamlet” and Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein” are haunted by the loss of close family members.

2.  In “Hamlet,” life is full of competitions, where you have to strengthen yourself and be wise enough to complete with your enemies. When Hamlet immersed himself in the pain of losing his father, he once questioned, “To be or not to be, that is a question” (3.1 57) He raised the issue of philosophy as the basic proposition. It can be said that Hamlet’s life switched to the dark side, or perhaps a more profound understanding. After the night on the balcony, he decided to cast his revenge. His immediate task was to think of a clever way to verify whether his uncle killed his father. Hamlet wants to find out through his observations, and he grows his urge to gain revenge against his uncle, Claudius. “I’ll observe his looks. I’ll tent him to the quick. If he but blench, I know my course” (2.2 585). The plot and the killing is contrary to the nature of Hamlet’s innocence, but his mission of revenge is necessary. Hamlet is deep in the desire for revenge against his uncle, who killed his father, and then takes the power of his father. As Hamlet slowly becomes a mature age, he is just a step closer to revenge.

3.  Life is full of love and joy, and you should not blind yourself with the evil around you. On one hand, he kills his uncle who takes the power over his father. “He stabs Claudius” (5.2 276). Then Claudius says, “O, yet defend me, friends, I am but hurt” (5.2 278). And then, “Claudius dies” (5.2 279). After many disasters, Hamlet finally kills Claudius. However, he is also paid a high price for this. That is to say, for the sacrifice, his mother Gertrude and he both die in the end. In order to protect her son Hamlet, “she drinks” (5.2 245) the wine that is poisoned. After a little while, “Gertrude falls” (5.2 256). And she said, “No, no, the drink, the drink! O my dear Hamlet! The drink, the drink! I am poisoned” (5.2 264). Then “she died” (5.2 264). As Hamlet tries to find the murderer, he is dying too. Laertes said that, “No med’cine in the world can do thee good. In thee there is not half an hour of life” (5.2 268). Then Hamlet told Horatio that, “tell him, with the occurrents, more and less, which have solicited—the rest is silence” (5.2 310). Then, “He gives a long sigh and dies” (5.2 312). We always have to face many choices in our lives. When we make a choice, it means we need to give up something that reaches the goal. Give up and gain, how can we gain without giving up? In the revenge with his uncle, Hamlet is partly a winner; however, he is also a loser.

4.  Shakespeare and Shelley both use various techniques to express the haunted loss that the main characters’ death means. The change of “Hamlet” and “Frankenstein,” we can see life can transform a person and both the writers Shakespeare and Shelley try to expose this topic with great effort. In these two novels, the description of the characters also demonstrates this attitude.

5.  Career is an important component of your life, but not the whole of your life, whereas friendship stands out as important features in life. In “Frankenstein,” he is kind of crazy when he meets a good book in his childhood. “When I returned home, my first care was to procure the whole works of this author, and afterwards of Paracelsus and Albertus Maguns” (39). After he grows up, he works more frantically. In his life, there was only one thing left, and that is work. “From this day natural philosophy, and particularly chemistry, in the most comprehensive sense of the term, became nearly my sole occupation” (50). Frankenstein dedicates himself into his experiment, which makes him forget the other important things around him and finally leads him into going crazy and mad. “Winter, spring, and summer passed away during my labours” (56). When he first saw the “thing” (57), his internal feeling was rejection. He could not believe that the thing that he created was so ugly and scary. Therefore, he became mad and upset. However, he forgot other important things could bring him happiness and relaxation. “… in a moment forgot my horror and misfortune; I felt suddenly, and for the first time during many months, calm and serene joy” (60). Career is not the whole of life.

6.  Evil is the internal reflection of people’s heart, which can be conquered by love and affection. Frankenstein is a combination of double typical natures, where there is kindness and evil. When he was young, he admitted he has a bad temper. “My temper was sometimes violent, and my passions vehement” (37). In the development of the novel, this is also a fight between Frankenstein’s internal heart, whereas the good conquers the bad. “Abhorred monster! Fiend that thou art!” (99). He shouted to the monster loudly. Frankenstein is haunted by the monster that kills his brother William and his fiancée Elizabeth. He is in range to capture the monster, which was created by him, and lost his life in creating it. However, when he was a child, he was a happy and lovely boy. He was so proud of his father. “My father had filled several public situations with honour and reputation.” His father was the best in his eyes. During that time, he was happy at least. After he grew up, everything had changed. The long-time oppression, discrimination and persecution made him a lunatic where he changed from good to bad.

7.         The overarching characteristics in these two stories is the idea of revenge. On the one hand, there is Hamlet, who is trying to gain revenge against the man who murdered his father, and Frankenstein is seeking Victor Frankenstein for leaving him being all alone in an empty existence. There are various underlying characteristics in both pieces of literature such as madness, death and learning. For example, death is the source that triggers the yearning for revenge in both of the pieces. In “Hamlet,” as discussed, this is shown when Hamlet discovers that it is King Claudius who murdered his father. In Scene 5 of Act 1, the Ghost encourages Hamlet to avenge his father’s “unnatural” murder. After thinking he hears a ghost say this, Hamlet responds, “Haste me to know’t, that I, with wings as swift/As meditation or the thoughts of love,/ May sweep to my revenge” (29). This interaction that Hamlet believes he had actually happens prior to the discovery of who killed his father. After hearing from the Ghost, Hamlet says that he will gain revenge for his father’s murder in a timely fashion. Similar to Frankenstein, Hamlet believes that death is the only way to find vengeance.

8.         It is also interesting to note that both of the causes of the revenge plots are the causes of their own demise. In Claudius’ case, his killing of Hamlet’s father triggers a rage inside of Hamlet that can only be addressed with Claudius’ death. In essence, he is the creator of his own demise. The same can be said for Frankenstein, who is seeking revenge against his maker for creating him and then leaving him alone without a purpose in life. However, in Frankenstein’s case, he doesn’t decide to seek revenge immediately. Instead, he tries to live out his existence alone before he decides to go after his creator. This happens when he is not able to live at the cabin, and then he looks to Victor as a cohort, which is his attempt to mitigate the suffering in his depressing existence.

9.         Both characters have gone through tremendous suffering because of the situation each of them were put in, and each of them goes a little mad due to the situation. Hamlet is questioning his own sanity in the story, but he does believe that he should seek revenge for his father’s death. This indecisiveness, however, is the characteristic of a sane person, who is taking very close consideration to what they might be about to do. Frankenstein, on the other hand, is very decisive about what he intends to do. He essentially cowers to being inactive in taking action against his creator. But he is the maker of his own demise, and this leads the reader to not have sympathy for Frankenstein, but Hamlet does gain the audience’s sympathy.

10.       Even the characters around Hamlet seem to have some pity for him. But he isn’t being told the whole story by those who say they are his friend. Many of them may keep appearances, but then actually are platting his death. This is shown when Claudius says “liberty is full of threats to all,” and “[Hamlet’s] providence [he and the queen] should have kept short, restrain’d and out of haunt, this mad young man: but so much was our love, we would not understand what was most fit” (20). This line shows that Claudius is pretending to have pity for Hamlet, but the reader knows that Claudius is a murderer, even though he is devising this façade for the queen. This reveals to the reader that Claudius doesn’t have remorse for killing his brother in cold blood. The falsity is furthered by Hamlet’s so-called friends when they go to England with him. They say that they are concerned about his mental well-being, but it becomes clear that they are lying after it is shown that Claudius intends to murder Hamlet in England because of his suspicion that Hamlet knows about him killing his father and that Hamlet will attempt to take Claudius’ life. It is ironic that, in the end, it is the so-called friends of Hamlet that are executed by English authorities.

11.      On the other hand, Frankenstein is genuinely pitied by his friends and family. They would sit next to his bed and help him when he was feeling sick. They were also informed by him that Clerval was somewhat understanding of the fact that he was crazy. “When he observed me more attentively, he saw a wildness in m eyes for which he could not account, and my loud, unrestrained, heartless laughter frightened and astonished him” (46). This wasn’t when Frankenstein was coughing up blood onto the bed sheets that surrounded him, or when he was vomiting in his bed pan. Furthermore, unlike Claudius, who is a stone-cold killer, Clerval pities Frankenstein and he nurses him back to being healthy again, and this happened on several occasions. Clerval actually nurses Frankenstein back to health after he is found washed up on shore. Actually, Kirwin declares that Frankenstein is innocent of murder, and he cares for him like a Clerval. And he also examines his letters and writes to Frankenstein’s family to let them know about how he is doing.

12.  All in all, these two novels both expound suffering of the family members’ losses. The death of Hamlet’s father made him want to avenge his father. Therefore, he paid the high price for it. More people died in this situation, even himself. Similarly, Frankenstein created a monster without gave him love and care, so the monster killed Frankenstein’s family members in order to gain revenge. This is the same as Hamlet. They both died just like their family members in the end.

A.      Write a sentence that summarizes the point of your paragraph. What is the main argument in the paragraph?
1. In this paragraph, I am describing what the essay is about before making a thesis statement about the common fact that death becomes a central part of each story. I need to improve the grammar and the strength of my thesis statement. I will improve this by having better adjectives in my thesis statement.
2. In this paragraph I am discussing the complications that are experienced by Hamlet and why he is seeking revenge. I need to be a bit more clear about why he was once a good person, and now he is facing ethical challenges. I will do this by showing that killing his uncle is necessary.

3. I’m trying in this paragraph to explain the difficulties of having to make harsh. Decisions, I am showing that they don’t always pan out. I need to improve my transition here from speaking about the issue related to making tough decisions, and actually executing them. I also need to improve the academic tone. I’ll do this by tightening up the text to make it flow better.

4. I’m trying to link in this paragraph the desires of the two authors. I could make what I am saying more clear for the reader to understand. I could also improve the active voice in my sentences. I will provide a better example of how the authors are aiming for the same things.
5. In this paragraph I am talking about Frankenstein and the fact that career shouldn’t be everything. I need to improve the flow of the sentences and the example of Frankenstein that I use. I will do this by talking more about what he did in order to create the monster.

6. In this paragraph I was trying to show how much Frankenstein is like real people. I need to improve the grammar in this paragraph and I need to make more clear what I mean. I’ll do this by tightening up the writing by getting rid of confusing words.

7. In this paragraph I am trying to link the two stories more. I need to improve the examples of revenge. I also need to improve some of the punctuation errors. I will do this by providing clearer examples of why the characters are seeking revenge.

8. In this paragraph I’m talking about how each character that is the victim of revenge created their own demise. I need to improve the active voice in this paragraph and the transition between the two stories. I will do this by getting rid of a sentence and replacing it with a better transition.

9. I’m talking about the characters’ sanity in this paragraph. I need to improve the use of adjectives and the examples given. I will do this by using an example of Hamlets madness that shows the conflict he is feeling inside.

10. In this paragraph I am showing the similarities in the two characters in the pity they did and didn’t receive. I need to be more clear that I am comparing pity in this paragraph, and I need to shorten my sentences. I will do this by mentioning pity in the opening sentence.

11. Here, I am showing more of the pity that Frankenstein is experiencing. I need to explain more of the back story so that the reader understands. I also need to describe more of what Frankenstein was thinking when he was washed up. I can improve this by being clearer about the situation when he washed up on the beach.

12. In this paragraph I am trying to combine the two stories in a concise summary. I need to improve the seamless transition between plots, and the summary to the essay. I will do this by reviewing some of what was covered in the essay.


Sample by My Essay Writer

Question 1
In your mind, is it ever okay to pad your resume, using language or including information that intentionally misleads the reader, in order to get an interview?

No. It is never a good idea to pad your resume. There are many consequences to having a padded resume, and it is always the best idea to have a good public image, particularly when you are looking for work in a specific industry. Padding the resume is an unethical practice that can have serious consequences.

Is it permissible to embellish your experiences or qualifications?

It is not permissible to embellish your experiences or qualifications. This is extremely unprofessional, and anyone who does it isn’t likely to get anywhere in their business. Resumes need to be honest and professional in order to be respected in the industry.
What might be the possible consequences of a padded resume?

The most major consequence of a padded resume is the appearance that you won’t convey. If you are caught padding your resume, anyone who knows about it won’t want to work with you. They won’t trust you, and so you want be able to secure the position that you are looking for. Many people could quickly become informed about the fact that you padded your resume.

Do they outweigh perceived potential benefits?

Yes, I believe the risks outweigh the benefits. People should be as honest as possible on a resume because if it does become known that you have lied on your resume, it can do far more damage than the good it would do if you weren’t caught. It is possible that lying could lead to a job, but that job won’t likely last forever, but the damage that could be done by lying on your resume could last a lot longer.

Have you ever known someone who padded his or her resume? What happened?

I have never known someone to pad their resume, but I have known people to make a big deal out of things that aren’t a big deal. For example, a person I know applied to be a writer for a newspaper. However, she had only experience with online writer. Even though she just posted blogs and similar type of writing online, she said that she was a journalist of 2 years. To me, this is a form of padding the resume, because she had not journalism experience, just blogging experience.

Question 2
Resume or CV? Discuss the differences between a resume and a CV? In your own words, describe those differences here.

The CV is more common than the basic resume in many cultures and industries. The basic difference is that a CV provides for multiple pages, due to its format. Resumes, however, only allow for one page.

When might you use each document in your own career? 

I would use a CV in my career if I was going to showcase my work that has been published in the media. This would only be necessary if my list of credentials was so long that it took up more than one page. I probably wouldn’t have enough information that I need to put on my resume as an artist right away, so I would wait until I accumulated enough accomplishments before I submit a CV when applying for a job.


Sample by My Essay Writer

Question 1
Based on the reading of Sacred Geometry Philosophy & Practice, discuss how the Greeks and Egyptians used geometry?

The Greeks used geometry in many ways. One of the most major ways the Greeks used geometry was to study the stars. Plato thought the moon and stars wold have a circular motion, because that is the simplest motion that can go on endlessly. But another way, a way that was shared with the Romans, was to plan the construction of churches, religious monuments, sacred groves and holy wells. And this is the sacred aspect cited in the reading.

How did they discover geometry?

Geometry was discovered through the pre-modern mathematics and the other are where it was discovered was through numbers. For the Greeks, geometry was their society’s crown jewel. The geometry was expanded to surfaces, solids, figures and curves. They used logical deduction, evolving the previous form of solely trial and error. The Romans discovered it predominantly through engineering, but not much with mathematics.

Do you agree with their study? Where do you disagree?

I think the study is fairly complete; however, it does not give enough credit to the other societies that dealt closely with geometry. Specifically, Egyptian geometry is among the most amazing of them all, and was used to construct the pyramid. The Egyptians also discovered a way to approximate the area of a circle, which is a major breakthrough.


Sample by My Essay Writer

Question 1
Can you discuss how we could standardize our highly electronic society to make easier human interfaces for all these objects and reduce consumer anxieties about using these new or ever-changing products of the electronic society?

We are certainly using fast printing to create many works, and this is creating a culture that is much more capable of creating art. However, I would argue that this new form is not so much art, than the facilitation of technology. For example, someone who takes a photo now does not need to have a high level of skill in a lot of cases. PhotoShop and other technology is able to create a copy that looks to be much better than it actually is. Technology is taking much of the process and skill out of creating art, and this is reducing the amount of consumer anxieties related to using the new products. PhotoShop is just one of the latest additions to technology that is creating better human interfaces with the technology around then, but the fast printing methods were among the first to make the process easier for people.

How could industrial designers bring this change about?

Industrial designers have already brought about a lot of change to the ways that we use technology, and they have facilitated a tremendous amount of coordination between the users and the designers. This has created a world of do-it-your-selfers and I am sure there is still a ways to go in this department. The industrial designers are the architects of this change. They are the people who can create easier ways for us to create that which we set out to create.

Questions 2
What objects that were used for survival in the Middle Ages are being used today in a modern or modified form? Give examples of highly contemporary versions and designs of those objects. 

Fire is the biggest thing that was used for survival in the Middle Ages. The wheel is another major thing that was used in the middle ages that is still used today. Instead of having rock wheels, however, we have rubber tires. And instead of created fire by rubbing sticks together, we have matches and lighters.


Sample by My Essay Writer

Question 1.
We have learned about several artists with multicultural and/or plural gender identities (who belong to or identify with more than one group) who address and explore issues of identity in our contemporary world. Choose one to discuss and consider how he/she employs the artwork to address this.

In Nikki S. Lee’s work, she pushes the boundaries of the perceived identity in her gender and race, particularly in her series called Parts. In this work, Lee portrays various stereotypes and roles that are taken on by Asian women. She exaggerates the various exotic and submissive labels in Asian women by portraying them in various ways. For example, there is the passive women that is dubbed the “china doll,” who is with the white man. The seductress in the exotic stage is also portrayed. In her work, she does way with the traditional stereotypes that are given to Asian women.

Question 2
How is text different than images when dealing with constructions of identity?

Text is often a way to be very literal about the art, while the images are always put through the subjective filter of the viewer. Therefore, the identity of the viewer is factored into the way the image is perceived. When text is being used, it is able to address each issue very directly. Furthermore, text can be added to prompt the viewer to pay attention to the factors that the artists wants them to pay attention to.

How is text both helpful and problematic in discussing constructions of identity? Provide an example from your own experiences.

In my experience text was at a time a problem in my construction of identity because I wasn’t very good at written communication. That made it so when I wrote something, people could begin to perceive me as being not as intelligent as I actually am. Communication was very challenging for me in that way, and that is why I taught myself to become a better writer. The quality of my writing has now improved, and this has helped communicate my identity of being an educated person.


Sample by My Essay Writer

Question 3.1 
Who do you think was or were the first industrial designer(s)?

I think Eli Whitney was the first industrial designer because he designed items that could be developed with mass-production techniques. He was meeting the demand for the need of tools that would help to make it easier to complete various tasks. Whitney had a vision to develop products that were interchangeable. These product parts helped facilitate the trend towards industry and mass production.

Why and how was their thinking emulated in contemporary problem solving?

His thinking was emulated in contemporary problem solving by having parts that are used in various objects. For example, many power cords are compatible with various electronics today. On the other hand, there are many that are built to intentionally not function in other products. This includes the charger for the iPad, for example, which is not compatible with the charger for the iPhone.

Question 3.2
Give some examples of objects that you consider design classics, that have beauty and are functional (for example, the common pin, the staple, a coffee grinder).

I think tables with four legs have got to be among the most functions objects. The four legs not only provide the necessary support for most tables, but the design also makes these tables aesthetically pleasing. The table, and four-legged chairs, for example, adhere to the Shaker principles in developments in several ways. A couple of the most prominent ways include the idea that regularity is beauty. The basic four-legged function is regular, and it provides practicality, which also arises a sense of beauty, according to Shaker.

Question 3.3
If the Crystal Palace was the first World Expo and was high technology in its time, compare it to our contemporary Crystal Palace, the Web. How could we use the Web better to do the same things the Crystal Palace did for personkind?

I think the web is being utilized very well. The Crystal Palace helped develop various aspects of design, education, relations, tourism and international trade. The Internet is facilitating all of those things. I suppose there could be improvements to the Web, however. For example, we could get rid of all of the spam advertisements. I believe this is something that has come a long way over the last decade, however. In the 1990s, it was essentially impossible to protect the computer from being bombarded with various ads that the user had no reason or desire to view. Instead of advertisement popups that promote a sedentary lifestyle filled with promotions for products that aren’t really needed, popups could be used to promote more diplomatic relations, or to announce important developments in the world. But, better than any of that, the popups on the Web could be eliminated completely. While that is something that is already occurring, there are many instances where the AdBlocker technology can’t be used to block some ads.